THE CHANGING PATTERN OF SOCIAL DIALOGUE IN EUROPE AND THE INFLUENCE OF ILO AND EU GEORGIAN TRIPARTISM

Francesco Bagnardi

Abstract


This paper aims to analyse the establishment of tripartite social dialogue practices at national level in the Republic of Georgia. The introduction of such practice is the result of European Union’s political pressures, International Labour Organization’s technical assistance and international trade unions confederations’ (namely the ETUC and the ITUC) support.
After describing the practices of social dialogue in Western and Eastern Europe, the paper outlines, with a comparative viewpoint, the process that led to the establishment of a national commission for a tripartite social dialogue between government and organized social partners in Georgia. A particular attention is paid to the pressure, leverage and technical help provided by the aforementioned international actors in this process. Moreover, the research illustrates the main achievements and failures of tripartitism in Georgia, as well as the principal constraints that limit the effectiveness of this practice. It is therefore analysed the influence that possible future development of tripartite dialogue between government and social partners can have on the social, economic and political development of the country as a whole.

Full Text:

PDF

References


1. Ales, E., Engblom, S., Jaspers, T., Laulom, S., Sciarra, S., Sobczak, A. and Valdes Dal-Re, F., Transnational collective bargaining: past, present and future. Final Report, European Commission - Directorate General Employment, Social Affairs andEqual Opportunities - Unit D2, Brussels, 2006.

2. Alonso, A.,What’s left to trade: the changing logic of corporatist policymaking in Europe, EUI Working Paper MWP 2011/14, Florence: European University Institute, 2011.

3. Association Green Alternative, “Hidden costs of privatization”, Tbilisi 2014. Available at: http://greenalt.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/HIDDEN_COSTS_OF_PRIVATIZATION.pdf.

4. Baccaro, L. and Simoni, M., “Policy Concertation in Europe: Understanding Government Choice”, Comparative Political Studies, 41: 10, 2008

5. Baumann, E., “Post-Soviet Georgia: It’s a Long, Long Way to “Modern” Social Protection”, Économies et Sociétés, Série Développement, croissance et progress, Volume 46, 2/2012

6. Beltadze, P. “Status of the Social Dialogue in Georgia”, in: Eastern Partnership and Convergence with EU Policies in Georgia, GFSIS and FES, Tbilisi, 2012

7. Bohle, D. and Greskovits, B., “Capital, Labor and the Prospects of the European Social Model in the East”, Central and Easter Europe Working Paper No. 58, Centre for European Studies, Harvard University, 2004.

8. Bohle, D. and Greskovits, B., “Neoliberalism, Embedded Neoliberalism and Neocorporatism: Path towards Transnational Capitalism in Central-Eastern Europe”, West European Politics, Vol. 30, No. 3, 2007

9. Bohle, D. and Greskovits, B., “The Political Economy of Protest and Patience in Esat-Central Europe. The 1990s and the Early 2000s”, Taiwan Journal of Democracy, Volume 8, No 2, 2012

10. Boni, G., “Introduction”, in: Schömann et al., Transnational collective bargaining at company level – A new component of European industrial relations?, Brussels: ETUI, 2012

11. Branco, C., E., ENPI 08-14 Black Sea Labour Market Reviews: Georgia Country Report, Torino: European Training Foundation, 2010.

12. Buchanan, J. M.,“The fiscal crisis in welfare democracies: with some implication for public investment”, in: Shibata H. and Ihori T. (eds.), The Welfare State, Public Investment, and Growth, Selected Papers from the 53rd Congress of the international Institute of Public Finance, Tokio et al.: Springer, 1998

13. Clauwert, S., “European framework agreement: ‘nomina nuda tenemus’ or what’s in a name? – Experiences of the European social dialogue”, in: Schömann et al., Transnational collective bargaining at company level – A new component of European industrial relations?, Brussels: ETUI, 2012

14. Compston, H., “The Strange Persistence of Policy Concertation” in: Berger, S. and Compston, H. (eds.), Policy Concertation and Social Partnership in Western Europe: Lessons for the 21st Century, Oxford: Berghahn Books, 2002

15. Cradden, C., “Understanding the past to change the present: the social compromise, the corporate theory of society and the future shape of industrial relations”, in: Serrano, M., Xhafa, E. and Fichter, M. (eds.), Trade Unions and the global crisis: Labour’s visions, strategies and responses, Geneva: International Labour Office, ILO, 2011

16. Cristophe, B., From Hybrid Regime to Hybrid Capitalism? The Political Economy of Georgia under Eduard Shevardnadze, Center for Contemporary European Studies, Conference paper for the conference Varieties of capitalism in post-communist countries, 23-24 September 2005, University of Paisley. Available at: http://georgica.tsu.edu.ge/?p=209.

17. Crouch, C. J., “Conditions for Trade-Union Wage Restraint”, in L. N. Lindberg and C. S. Maier (eds.), The Politics of Inflation and Economic Stagnation: Theoretical Approaches and International Case Studies,Washington, DC: Brookings Institution, 1985

18. Crouch, C. J., Industrial Relations and European State Traditions,Oxford: University Press, 1993.

19. Crowley, S., “Explaining Labor Quiescence in Post-Communist Europe: Historical Legacies and Comparative Perspective”, Center for European Studies Central and Eastern Europe Working Paper No. 55, Oberlin College, 2002.

20. De Boer, R., Benedictus, H. and van der Meer, M., “Broadening without Intensification: The Added Value of the European Social and Sectoral Dialogue”, European Journal of Industrial Relations, Volume 11, No. 1, 2005

21. Degryse, C., European Social Dialogue: State of play and prospects – Final Report, Brussels: European Social Observatory (OSE), 2011.

22. De Waal, T., The Caucasus: an introduction, Oxford: University Press, 2010.

23. De Waal, T., Georgia’s Choices: charting a future in uncertain times, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, Washington D.C., 2011.

24. Elster, J., Offe, C. and Preuss U. K., Institutional Design in Post-communist societies: Rebuilding the Ship at Sea, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.

25. Eradze, I., Environmental Sustainability of Georgian Economic Policies in 2004-2013, Center for Social Sciences, Tbilisi, 2014.

26. ESI, Georgia’s Libertarian Revolution. Part three: Jacobins in Tbilisi, European Stability Initiative, Berlin – Tbilisi – Istanbul, 2010.

27. Esping-Andersen, G., The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism, Princeton: University Press, 1990.

28. ETUI, Benchmarking Working Europe 2014, Brussels: ETUI, 2014.

29. European Commission, “COMMISSION DECISION of 20 May 1998 on the establishment of Sectoral Dialogue Committees promoting the Dialogue between the social partners at European level”, 98/500/EC, Brussels, 1998.

30. European Commission, “The European social dialogue: A force for innovation and change”, Communication 341 final, Brussels, 2002.

31. European Council, “COUNCIL DIRECTIVE 94/45/EC of 22 September 1994 on the establishment of a European Works Council or a procedure in Community-scale undertakings and Community-scale groups of undertakings for the purposes of informing and consulting employees”, Brussels, 1994.

32. European Council, “DIRECTIVE 2009/38/EC OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 6 May 2009 on the establishment of a European Works Council or a procedure in Community-scale undertakings and Community-scale groups of undertakings for the purposes of informing and consulting employees (Recast)”, Brussels, 2009.

33. Ferrera, M., Liberal Neo-Welfarism: new perspectives for the European Social Model, OSE Opinion Paper No. 14, Brussels: European Social Observatory (OSE),2013.

34. Ghellab, Y. and Papadakis, K., “The politics of economic adjustment in Europe: state unilateralism or social dialogue”, in: The global crisis: Causes, responses and challenges,International Labour Office, Geneva: ILO, 2011

35. Glassner, V. and Keune, M., “Negotiating the crisis? Collective bargaining in Europe during the economic downturn”,Industrial and Employment Relations Department, International Labour Office, Geneva: ILO, 2010.

36. Gold, M., Cressey, P. and Léonard, E., “Whatever Happened to Social Dialogue? From Partnership to Managerialism in the EU Employment Agenda”, European Journal of Industrial Relations, Volume 13, Number 1, (2007)

37. Greskovits, B., The Political Economy of Protest and Patience: East European and Latin American Transformations Compared, Budapest: Central European University Press, 1998.

38. Gugushvili, D., The new welfare agenda – missing the most vulnerable once again, Center for Social Sciences, Tbilisi, 2013.

39. Hall, P. A. and Soskice D. “An Introduction to Varieties of Capitalism”, in: Hall, P. A. and Soskice D. (eds.), Varieties of Capitalism. The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage, Oxford: University Press Inc.,2001

40. Hamann K., Kelly J., “Varieties of capitalism and industrial relations”, in: Blyton P.et al. (eds.), The SAGE handbook of industrial relations, London: Sage, 2008

41. Hassel, A, “The Politics of Social Pacts”, British Journal of Industrial Relations, Vol. 41, No. 4, (Dec. 2003)

42. Hirshmann, A. O., Exit, Voice, and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States, Cambridge, Mass., and London: Harvard University Press, 1970.

43. Hyman, R., “Social dialogue and industrial relations during the economic crisis: Innovative practices or business as usual?”, Industrial and Employment Relations Department - DIALOGUE, International Labour Office, Geneva: ILO, 2010.

44. Iankova, E., A., “The Transformative Corporatism of Eastern Europe”, East European Politics & Societies, Vol. 12, No. 2, March 1998

45. Iankova, E., A., “Capitalism by Design? Central and Easter Europe’s Accession to the European Union”, National Council for Eurasian and East European Research, Cornell University, 2000.

46. Iankova, E., A., Eastern European Capitalism in the Making, Cambridge: University Press, 2002.

47. ILO, “Declaration concerning the aims and purposes of the International Labour Organization”, International Labour Conference, 26th Session, Philadelphia, 1944.

48. ILO, “Declaration on Fundamental principles and rights at work”, International Labour Conference, 86th Session, Geneva, 1998.

49. ILO,“Decent work and the informal economy”, Report VI, International Labour Conference, 90th Session, Geneva, 2002a.

50. ILO, “Resolution concerning Tripartism and social dialogue”, International Labour Conference, 90th Session, Geneva, 2002b.

51. ILO, “Declaration on Social Justice for a Fair Globalization”, International Labour Conference, 97th Session, Geneva, 2008.

52. ILO, “Recovering from the crisis: A Global Jobs Pact”, International Labour Conference, 98th Session, Geneva, 2009.

53. ILO, National tripartite social dialogue: an ILO guide for improved governance, International Labour Office, Social Dialogue and Tripartism Unit, Governance and Tripartism Department, Geneva: ILO, 2013a.

54. ILO, “Social Dialogue. Recurrent discussion underthe ILO Declaration on Social Justice for a Fair Globalization”, Report VI, International Labour Conference, 102nd Session, Geneva, 2013b.

55. Ishikawa, J., Key Features of National Social Dialogue: A Social Dialogue Resource Book, International Labour Office, Geneva: ILO, 2003.

56. ITUC, “Georgia: labour code tears fundamental rights to shred”, May 2008. Available at: http://www.ituc-csi.org/IMG/pdf/VS_georgia_EN.pdf.

57. ITUC, “Internationally Recognised Core Labour Standards in Georgia. Report for the WTO General Council Review for the Trade Policies of Georgia”, December 2009. Available at: http://www.ituc-csi.org/report-for-the-wto-general-council,5262.

58. ITUC, “Building democracy and trade union rights in the NIS”, ITUC-PERC Regional Conference, November 2010. Available at: http://www.ituc-csi.org/IMG/pdf/NIS_report.pdf.

59. ITUC, “Countries at risk: 2013 Report on Violations of Trade Union Rights”. Available at: http://www.ituc-csi.org/countries-at-risk-2013-report-on.

60. ITUC and ETUC, A Roadmap for Georgia, 2012. Available: http://perc.ituc-csi.org/Roadmap-for-Georgia?lang=en

61. Jagodzinski, R., “European Work Councils and transnational company agreements – balancing on the thin line between effective consultation and overstepping competences”, in: Schömann et al., Transnational collective bargaining at company level – A new component of European industrial relations?, Brussels: ETUI, 2012a

62. Jagodzinski, R., “Transnational collective bargaining: a literature review”, in: Schömann et al., Transnational collective bargaining at company level – A new component of European industrial relations?,Brussels: ETUI, 2012b

63. Jobelius, M., Economic Liberalism in Georgia: A challenge for EU Convergence and Trade Unions, Friedrich Ebert Stiftung, Tbilisi, 2011.

64. Jones, S., Georgia: A political history since independence, London: I.B. Tauris, 2013

65. Katzenstein, P., Corporatism and Change: Austria, Switzerland and the Politics of Industry, Ithaca:Cornell University Press, 1984.

66. Keune, M., “Introduction: Wage moderation, decentralisation of collective bargaining and low pay”, in Keune, M. and Galgóczi (eds.): Wages and wage bargaining in Europe: Developments since the mid-1990s, Brussels: ETUI, 2008

67. Khaduri, N., “Economic System in Georgia”, in: Moving Closer to Europe? Economic and social policies in Georgia, Armenia and Azerbaijan, Friederich Ebert Stitfung, Centre for Economic Problem Research, 2010

68. Khuntsaria, T., Prospect of Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Area (DCFTA) – Is there a European Way for Georgia?, Center for Social Sciences, Tbilisi, 2012.

69. Kubicek, P., “Organized Labor in Postcommunist States: Will the Western Sun Set on It, Too?”, Comparative Politics, Vol. 32, No. 1, Oct. 1999

70. Kuruvilla, S., “Social dialogue for decent work”, in: Ghai, D. (ed.), Decent work: Objectives and strategies, Geneva: International Institute for Labour Studies, 2006, pp. 175-215.

71. Messerlin, P., Emerson, M., Jandieri, G. and Le Vernoy, A., An appraisal of the EU’s trade policy towards its Eastern neighbours: the case of Georgia, Centre for European Policy Studies, Brussels, 2011.

72. Muskhelishvili, M., Constitutional Change in Georgia. Available at: http://www.idea.int/conflict/cb/upload/CBPGeorgiaMarina.pdf.

73. Muskhelishvili, M., Social Dialogue in Georgia, Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung, Tbilisi, 2011.

74. Natali, D. and Pochet, P, “The last wave of social pacts in Europe: problems, actors and institutions”, in: Pochet, P. et al (eds.), After the Euro and enlargement: social pacts in the EU, Brussels: European Trade Union Institute (ETUI) and Observatoire Social Européen (OSE), 2010

75. Narmania, D. et al, Eastern Partnership and Socio-Economic Policy of Georgia, CIESR, CEPR and OSGF, Tbilisi 2011.

76. Offe, C., “Capitalism by Democratic Design? Democratic Theory Facing the Triple Transition in East Central Europe”, Social Research: An International Quarterly, Vol. 58, no. 2 (Winter 1991)

77. Orenstein, O., M. and Hale, E., “Corporatist Renaissance in Post-communist Central Europe?”, in: Candland, C. and Sil, R. (eds.), The Politics of Labor in a Global Age: Continuity and Change in Late-Industrializing and Post-Socialist Economies, Oxford: University Press, 2001

78. Ost, D., “Illusory Corporatism in Easter Europe: Neoliberal Tripartism and Postcommunist Class Identities”, Warsaw Forum of Economic Sociology, Vol. 1, No. 2 (2), autumn 2010, pp. 91-122. Paper originally appeared in Politics and Society 28:4, December 2000

79. Ost, D., The Defeat of Solidarity: Anger and Politics in Postcommunist Europe, Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press, 2005.

80. Ost, D., The End of Postcommunism: Trade Unions in Eastern Europe’s Future, East European Politics and Societies, Vol. 23, No. 1, February 2009

81. Ost, D. and Crowley, S. (eds.), Workers after Workers’ States: Labor and Politics in Postcommunist Easter Europe, Boston: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2001a.

82. Ost, D. and Crowley, S., “The Surprise of Labor Weakness in Postcommunist Society”, in: Ost, D. and Crowley, S. (eds.), Workers after Workers’ States: Labor and Politics in Postcommunist Easter Europe, Boston: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2001b

83. Ost, D. and Crowley, S., “Making Sense of Labor Weakness in Postcommunism”, in: Ost, D. and Crowley, S. (eds.), Workers after Workers’ States: Labor and Politics in Postcommunist Easter Europe, Boston: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2001c

84. Papava, V., Poverty Reduction through Private Sector Development in Georgia: Policy, Practice and Perspective, Caucasian Review of International Affairs, Vol. 3 (3), Summer 2009

85. Papava, V., Reforming the post-Soviet Georgia’s Economy in 1991-2011, GFSIS Center for Applied Economic Studies Research Paper, 03-2013, GFSIS, Tbilisi.

86. Pizzorno A., “Political exchange and collective identity in industrial conflict”, in: Crouch, C. and Pizzorno, A. (eds.), The Resurgence of Class Conflict in Western Europe since 1968, London: Macmillan, 1978

87. Platzer, H-W., “Industrial relations and European integration: pattern, dynamics and limits of transnationalisation”, in: Platzer, H-W. (eds.), European Union – European industrial relations? Global challenges, national developments and transnational dynamics, London: Routledge, 1998

88. Pochet, P., Keune, M. and Natali, D, After the Euro and enlargement: social pacts in the EU, Brussels: European Trade Union Institute (ETUI) and Observatoire social Européen (OSE), 2010.

89. Reid, T. R., The United States of Europe: The New Superpower and the End of the American Supremacy, New York: Penguin Press, 2004.

90. Rekhviashvili, L., ‘Vision and the Role of the State; Visions of Post-Revolutionary Georgian Government’, Caucasus Social Science Review, Vol.1, Issue 1, 2013.

91. Rhodes, M. “Globalization, Labour markets and Welfare States: A future of “Competitive Corporatism”?” in: Rhodes, M. and Many, Y. (eds.), The future of European welfare, London: Macmillan, 1998

92. Rhodes, M., “The Political Economy of Social Pacts: ‘Competitive Corporatism’ and European Welfare Reform”, in: Pierson, P. (ed.), The New Politics of the Welfare State, Oxford: University Press, 2001

93. Rodgers, G., Lee, E., Swepston L. and Van Daele J.,The International Labour Organization and the quest for social justice, 1919–2009”, International Labour Office, Geneva: ILO, 2009.

94. Rychly, L., “Social dialogue in times of crisis: Finding better solutions” Geneva: ILO, 2009.

95. Schmidt, G., “Inclusive Growth: What Future for the European Social Model?”, IZA Policy Paper No. 82, Bonn: Institute for Study of Labor (IZA), 2014.

96. Schmitter, P. C., “Still the Century of Corporatism?”, The Review of Politics, Vol. 36, No. 01 (Jan, 1974)

97. Schömann, I., Jagodzinski, R., Boni, G., Clauwert, S., Glassner, V. and Jaspers, T., “Transnational collective bargaining at company level. A new component of European industrial relations?”, Brussels: European Trade Union Institute (ETUI), 2012.

98. Shvelidze, Z., Transition from Soviet to Liberal Labour Law: Labour Standards in Georgia. Available at:

99. http://ilera2012.wharton.upenn.edu/RefereedPapers/ShvelidzeZakaria%20ILERA%20updated.pdf.

100. Shvelidze, Z., “Working Time Regulation in Georgia”, E-Journal of International and Comparative Labour Studies, Volume 1, No. 1-2, March-June 2012

101. Siaroff, A. (1999). “Corporatism in 24 Industrial Democracies: Meaning and Measurement”, European Journal of Political Research, Vol. 36, No. 2,1999

102. Sobczak, A. and Léonard, E., “Transnational social dialogue at the sector and the company level”, Conference of the Regulating for Decent Work network – Regulating for decent work: innovative regulation as a response to globalization, International Labour Office, Geneva: ILO, 2009.

103. Timm, C., Economic regulation and state interventions: Georgia’s move from neoliberalism to state managed capitalism, PFH Forschungspapiere/Research Papers, No. 2013/03PFH, Private Hochschule Göttingen, 2013. Available at: http://georgica.tsu.edu.ge/?p=516.

104. Timm, C., A liberal developmental state in Georgia? State dominance and Washington Consensus in the post-communist region, PFH Forschungspapiere/Research Papers, No. 2014/02, PFH Private Hochschule Göttingen, 2014. Available at: http://georgica.tsu.edu.ge/?p=575.

105. Tordinava, T. and Özbakkaloğlu, E., “Social Dialogue in Georgia and European Union, EU integration Issues” – Visegard Countries and the South Caucasus, Caucasian Institute for Economic and Social Research, Tbilisi, 2013

106. Transparency International Georgia, “The Georgian Trade Union Movement”, February 2010. Available at: http://transparency.ge/en/node/322.

107. Traxler, F., “Corporatism(s) and pacts: changing functions and structures under rising economic liberalism and declining liberal democracy”, in: Pochet, P. et al. (eds.), After the Euro and enlargement: social pacts in the EU, Brussels: European Trade Union Institute (ETUI) and Observatoire social européen (OSE), 2010

108. UNDP, Aid for Trade Needs Assessment – Georgia. Trade and Human Development, 2011. Available at: http://www.ge.undp.org/content/georgia/en/home/library/poverty/aftgeorgia2011/.

109. Vandaele, K. “Social dialogue and worker representation in EU2020: underappreciated and underplayed”, in: Benchmarking Working Europe 2011, Brussels: ETUI,2011

110. Vandaele, K., “Do unions and worker representation bodies make for more or less inequalities?”, in: Benchmarking Working Europe 2012, Brussels: ETUI, 2012

111. Voss, E., Gospel, H., Dornelas, A., Vitols, K., “What works and why? Results of a synthesis review of social dialogue interventions 2002-2012”, International Labour Office, Evaluation Unit, Geneva: ILO, 2013.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.