Underground water level/temperature response to seismic/tectonic transients: effects of poroelasticity

Main Article Content

Tamaz Chelidze

Abstract

The problem of underground water flow is discussed in many publications. The upper crust down to approximately 20 km is a sequence of layers of porous/fractured fluid-saturated deformable rocks. When subjected to stress of various duration and mode, the excess transient pressure appears in the pore fluid, which can be observed practically as water level change/oscillations in boreholes. In the paper are presented elementary theoretical models of underground water level/temperature response to seismic/tectonic transients taking into account effects of poroelasticity (Biot model). Besides, a direct mechanical squeezing of pore water by seismic vibrations (instantaneous flow) is considered.

Published: Apr 26, 2017

Article Details

How to Cite
Chelidze, T. (2017). Underground water level/temperature response to seismic/tectonic transients: effects of poroelasticity. Journals of Georgian Geophysical Society, 19(20). Retrieved from https://ggs.openjournals.ge/index.php/GGS/article/view/1831
Section
Articles

References

Biot M. A. Mechanics of deformation and acoustic propagation in porous media, J. Appl. Phys., 33, 1962, 1482 – 1498.

Blanchard P., Byerly P. A study of well gage as a seismograph. Bull. Seismol.Soc. Amer., 25, 1935, 313-321.

Bredehoeft. Response of well-aquifer system to Earth tides. J. Geophys. Res.72, 1967, 3075-3087.

Brodsky E., Roeloffs E., Woodcock D., Gall I., Manga M. A mechanism for sustained groundwater pressure changes induced by distant earthquakes. J. Geophys. Res. 108, B8, 2003, 2390, doi:10.1029/2002JB002321,

Costain J., Bollinger J. Review: Research results in Hydroseismicity from 1987 to 2009. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 100, 2010, 1841-1858, doi: 10.1785/0120090288.

Domenico P., Schwartz F. Physical and Chemical Hydrogeology, 1990.

Dvorkin J., Nur A. Dynamic poroelasticity: a unified model with the squirt and the Biotmechanisms. Geophysics, 58, 1993, 524-533.

Wang C.-Y., Chia Y., Wang P-L., Dreger D. Role of S waves and Love waves in coseismic permeability enhancement. Geophys. Res. Lett. 36, 2009, L09404, doi:10.1029/2009GL037330.

Wang C.-Y., Manga M. Earthquakes and Water. Springer-Verlag Berlin, Heidelberg, 2010.

Zhang Y., Huang F. Mechanism of Different Coseismic Water-Level Changes in Wells with similar Epicentral Distances in Intermediate Field. Bull. Seis. Soc. America, 101, 2011, 1.

Blanchard P., Byerly P. A study of well gage as a seismograph. Bull. Seismol.Soc. Amer., 25, 1935, 313-321.

Bredehoeft. Response of well-aquifer system to Earth tides. J. Geophys. Res.72, 1967, 3075-3087.

Meinzer O. Groundwater in United States: US Geol. Survey, Water Supply Papers, 628C, 1939, 94-144.

Jakob C.E. Fluctuations in artesian pressure produced by passing railroad trains as shown in a water level on Long Island, New York. Trans. Amer. Geophys. Union, 20, 1939, 666-674.

Palciauskas V., Domenico P. Fluid pressures in deforming porous rocks. Water Res. Research, 25, 1989, 203-213.

Roeloffs E. Hydrologic precursors to earthquakes: a review. Pure and Appl. Geophys. 126, 1988, 177-206.